Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
54 U.S.C. § 302302 — Program evaluation
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) When Evaluation Should Occcur 11 So in original. Probably should be “Occur”..—** Periodically, but not less than every 4 years after the approval of any State program under [section 302301 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title54-section302301&num=0&edition=prelim), the Secretary, in consultation with the Council on the appropriate provisions of this division, and in cooperation with the State Historic Preservation Officer, shall evaluate the program to determine whether it is consistent with this division.
**(b) Disapproval of Program.—** If, at any time, the Secretary determines that a major aspect of a State program is not consistent with this division, the Secretary shall disapprove the program and suspend in whole or in part any contracts or cooperative agreements with the State and the State Historic Preservation Officer under this division, until the program is consistent with this division, unless the Secretary determines that the program will be made consistent with this division within a reasonable period of time.
**(c) Oversight.—** The Secretary, in consultation with State Historic Preservation Officers, shall establish oversight methods to ensure State program consistency and quality without imposing undue review burdens on State Historic Preservation Officers.
**(d) State Fiscal Audit and Management System.—**
(1) **Substitution for comparable federal systems.—** — At the discretion of the Secretary, a State system of fiscal audit and management may be substituted for comparable Federal systems so long as the State system—
(A) establishes and maintains substantially similar accountability standards; and
(B) provides for independent professional peer review.
(2) **Fiscal audits and review by secret
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 54 U.S.C. § 302302
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 0dbd1b6aaa29af93ab6a4233f1226b721672ff0f55f72ac85b5e3abb11033175. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_1e32f6ada0aae2867ec7b84b
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-54/section-302302-program-evaluation--58b13590ac.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: f1d04ef7313b309882255125834ff6fcb02642b3ebe4035c2ea38e79e73422f8
Source location: Title 54, Chapter 3023, § 302302; chapter-3023-chapter-3023.md
Stored source content
**(a) When Evaluation Should Occcur 11 So in original. Probably should be “Occur”..—** Periodically, but not less than every 4 years after the approval of any State program under [section 302301 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title54-section302301&num=0&edition=prelim), the Secretary, in consultation with the Council on the appropriate provisions of this division, and in cooperation with the State Historic Preservation Officer, shall evaluate the program to determine whether it is consistent with this division.
**(b) Disapproval of Program.—** If, at any time, the Secretary determines that a major aspect of a State program is not consistent with this division, the Secretary shall disapprove the program and suspend in whole or in part any contracts or cooperative agreements with the State and the State Historic Preservation Officer under this division, until the program is consistent with this division, unless the Secretary determines that the program will be made consistent with this division within a reasonable period of time.
**(c) Oversight.—** The Secretary, in consultation with State Historic Preservation Officers, shall establish oversight methods to ensure State program consistency and quality without imposing undue review burdens on State Historic Preservation Officers.
**(d) State Fiscal Audit and Management System.—**
(1) **Substitution for comparable federal systems.—** — At the discretion of the Secretary, a State system of fiscal audit and management may be substituted for comparable Federal systems so long as the State system—
(A) establishes and maintains substantially similar accountability standards; and
(B) provides for independent professional peer review.
(2) **Fiscal audits and review by secretary.—** — The Secretary—
(A) may conduct periodic fiscal audits of State programs approved under this subdivision as needed; and
(B) shall ensure that the programs meet applicable accountability standards.
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
The Secretary, in consultation with the National Conference of State Historic Preservation Officers and the National Trust, shall promulgate regulations for State Historic Preservation Programs. The regulations shall provide that a State program submitted to the Secretary under this chapter shall be approved by the Secretary if the Secretary determines that the program provides for—
(1) the designation and appointment by the chief elected official of the State of a State Historic Preservation Officer to administer the program in accordance with [section 302303 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title54-section302303&num=0&edition=prelim) and for the employment or appointment by the officer of such professionally qualified staff as may be necessary for those purposes;
(2) an adequate and qualified State historic preservation review board designated by the State Historic Preservation Officer unless otherwise provided for by State law; and
(3) adequate public participation in the State Historic Preservation Program, including the process of recommending properties for nomination to the National Register.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 54 U.S.C. § 302301
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Approved State Program.—** Any local government shall be certified to participate under this section if the applicable State Historic Preservation Officer, and the Secretary, certify that the local government—
(1) enforces appropriate State or local legislation for the designation and protection of historic property;
(2) has established an adequate and qualified historic preservation review commission by State or local legislation;
(3) maintains a system for the survey and inventory of historic property that furthers the purposes of chapter 3023;
(4) provides for adequate public participation in the local historic preservation program, including the process of recommending properties for nomination to the National Register; and
(5) satisfactorily performs the responsibilities delegated to it under this division.
**(b) No Approved State Program.—** Where there is no State program approved under sections 302301 and 302302 of this title, a local government may be certified by the Secretary if the Secretary determines that the local government meets the requirements of subsection (a). The Secretary may make grants to the local government certified under this subsection for purposes of this subdivision.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 54 U.S.C. § 302503
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.