Arkansas Legal Resource Navigator

10 U.S.C. § 4201 — Major defense acquisition programs: definition; exceptions

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 4201 — Major defense acquisition programs: definition; exceptions

**(a) Definition.—** Except as provided under subsection (b), in this part, the term “major defense acquisition program” means a Department of Defense acquisition program that is not a highly sensitive classified program (as determined by the Secretary of Defense) and— (1) that is designated by the Secretary of Defense as a major defense acquisition program; or (2) in the case of a program that is not a program for the acquisition of an automated information system (either a product or a service), that is estimated by the Secretary of Defense to require— (A) an eventual total expenditure for research, development, test, and evaluation of more than $1,000,000,000 (based on fiscal year 2024 constant dollars); or (B) an eventual total expenditure for procurement, including all planned increments or spirals, of more than $4,500,000,000 (based on fiscal year 2024 constant dollars). **(b) Exceptions.—** In this part, the term “major defense acquisition program” does not include the following: (1) An acquisition program or project that is carried out using the rapid fielding or rapid prototyping acquisition pathway under [section 3602 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section3602&num=0&edition=prelim). (2) An acquisition program for a defense business system (as defined in [section 2222(i)(1) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section2222/i/1&num=0&edition=prelim)) carried out using the acquisition guidance issued pursuant to section 883(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; [10 U.S.C. 2223a](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section2223a&num=0&edition=prelim) note).11 See References in

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 4201

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: c6277c852c336c023a14c3b5e2141dc04ec76f1ba1fa5208d64e4b5ced316852. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_1a61e50399f1631790c15575
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-10/section-4201-major-defense-acquisition-programs-definition-exceptions--2f763de9cf.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 9d80fa54ade73f618281b3444a0a72b238cb2ac7df6db9adce163b9886674fb8

Source location: Title 10, Chapter 321, § 4201; chapter-321-general-matters.md

Stored source content

**(a) Definition.—** Except as provided under subsection (b), in this part, the term “major defense acquisition program” means a Department of Defense acquisition program that is not a highly sensitive classified program (as determined by the Secretary of Defense) and— (1) that is designated by the Secretary of Defense as a major defense acquisition program; or (2) in the case of a program that is not a program for the acquisition of an automated information system (either a product or a service), that is estimated by the Secretary of Defense to require— (A) an eventual total expenditure for research, development, test, and evaluation of more than $1,000,000,000 (based on fiscal year 2024 constant dollars); or (B) an eventual total expenditure for procurement, including all planned increments or spirals, of more than $4,500,000,000 (based on fiscal year 2024 constant dollars). **(b) Exceptions.—** In this part, the term “major defense acquisition program” does not include the following: (1) An acquisition program or project that is carried out using the rapid fielding or rapid prototyping acquisition pathway under [section 3602 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section3602&num=0&edition=prelim). (2) An acquisition program for a defense business system (as defined in [section 2222(i)(1) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section2222/i/1&num=0&edition=prelim)) carried out using the acquisition guidance issued pursuant to section 883(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; [10 U.S.C. 2223a](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section2223a&num=0&edition=prelim) note).11 See References in Text note below. (3) An acquisition program for software and covered hardware as described by [section 3603 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section3603&num=0&edition=prelim).

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 3201 — Full and open competition

**(a) In General.—** Except as provided in sections 3203, 3204(a), and 3205 of this title and except in the case of procurement procedures otherwise expressly authorized by statute, the head of an agency in conducting a procurement for property or services— (1) shall obtain full and open competition through the use of competitive procedures in accordance with the requirements of this section and sections 3069, 3203, 3204, 3205, 3403, 3405, 3406, 3901, 4501, and 4502 of this title and the Federal Acquisition Regulation; and (2) shall use the competitive procedure or combination of competitive procedures that is best suited under the circumstances of the procurement. **(b) Determination of Appropriate Competitive Procedures.—** In determining the competitive procedure appropriate under the circumstances, the head of an agency— (1) shall solicit sealed bids if— (A) time permits the solicitation, submission, and evaluation of sealed bids; (B) the award will be made on the basis of price and other price-related factors; (C) it is not necessary to conduct discussions with the responding sources about their bids; and (D) there is a reasonable expectation of receiving more than one sealed bid; and (2) shall request competitive proposals if sealed bids are not appropriate under paragraph (1). **(c) Efficient Fulfillment of Government Requirements.—** The Federal Acquisition Regulation shall ensure that the requirement to obtain full and open competition is implemented in a manner that is consistent with the need to efficiently fulfill the Government’s requirements. **(d) Certain Purchases or Contracts to Be Treated as if Made With Sealed-bid Procedures.—** For the purposes of the following, purchases or contracts awarded after using procedures other than seale

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 3201

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 3603 — Software acquisition pathways

**(a) Software Acquisition and Development Pathways.—** The Secretary of Defense shall establish pathways as described under subsection (b) to provide for the efficient and effective acquisition, development, integration, and timely delivery of software and covered hardware. **(b) Pathways.—** The Secretary of Defense may establish as many pathways under this section as the Secretary determines appropriate and shall establish the following pathways: (1) **Applications.—** — The applications pathway shall provide for the use of rapid development and implementation of applications and other software or software improvements operated by the Department of Defense, which may include applications and associated procurement of covered hardware (including modifications of a type not customarily available in the commercial marketplace to meet Department requirements), commercially available cloud computing platforms, and other nondevelopmental items. (2) **Embedded systems.—** — The embedded systems pathway shall provide for the rapid development and insertion of upgrades and improvements for software and covered hardware embedded in weapon systems and other hardware systems unique to the Department of Defense. **(c) Requirements for Pathways.—** A pathway established under this section shall provide for the use of proven technologies and solutions to continuously engineer and deliver capabilities for software and covered hardware. **(d) Considerations for Use of Authority.—** In using the authority under this section, the Secretary shall consider how such use will— (1) initiate the engineering of new software capabilities quickly and, if applicable, the integration of such capabilities into covered hardware; (2) demonstrate the viability and effectiveness of such capabil

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 3603

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 3001 — Defense acquisition system; element of the defense acquisition system

**(a) Defense Acquisition System.—** In this part, the term “defense acquisition system” means— (1) the workforce engaged in carrying out the acquisition of property and services for the Department of Defense; (2) the management structure responsible for directing and overseeing the acquisition of property and services for the Department of Defense; and (3) the statutory, regulatory, and policy framework that guides the acquisition of property and services for the Department of Defense. **(b) Element of the Defense Acquisition System.—** In this part, the term “element of the defense acquisition system” means an organization that— (1) employs members of the acquisition workforce; (2) carries out acquisition functions; and (3) focuses primarily on acquisition. **(c) Acquisition.—** In this part, the term “acquisition” has the meaning provided in [section 131 of title 41](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title41-section131&num=0&edition=prelim).

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 3001

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 2302 — Repealed. Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, § 1806(d), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4155]

### Statutory Notes Section, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 127; Pub. L. 85–568, title III, § 301(b), July 29, 1958, 72 Stat. 432; Pub. L. 85–861, § 1(43A), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1457; Pub. L. 96–513, title V, § 511(74), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2926; Pub. L. 98–369, div. B, title VII, § 2722(a), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 1186; Pub. L. 98–525, title XII, § 1211, Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2589; Pub. L. 98–577, title V, § 504(b)(3), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 3087; Pub. L. 99–661, div. A, title XIII, § 1343(a)(13), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3993; Pub. L. 100–26, § 7(k)(2), Apr. 21, 1987, 101 Stat. 284; Pub. L. 101–189, div. A, title VIII, § 853(b)(1), Nov. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1518; Pub. L. 102–25, title VII, § 701(d)(1), Apr. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 113; Pub. L. 102–190, div. A, title VIII, § 805, Dec. 5, 1991, 105 Stat. 1417; Pub. L. 103–355, title I, § 1502, Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3296; Pub. L. 104–106, div. D, title XLIII, § 4321(b)(3), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 672; Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title VIII, §§ 805(a)(1), 807(a), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2605, 2606; Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title VIII, § 803(b), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1832; Pub. L. 107–217, § 3(b)(2), Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1295; Pub. L. 107–296, title XVII, § 1704(b)(1), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2314; Pub. L. 111–350, § 5(b)(8), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3842; Pub. L. 111–383, div. A, title VIII, § 866(g)(1), Jan. 7, 2011, 124 Stat. 4298; Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title X, § 1071(a)(2), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3504; Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title VIII, § 815(b), Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 896; Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title II, § 221, Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1333; Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, § 836(c)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1864; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, § 1806(a)(5), (6), (b)(2)–(6

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 2302

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 2430 — Repealed. Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, § 1846(f)(8), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4251]

### Statutory Notes Section, added Pub. L. 100–26, § 7(b)(2)(A), Apr. 21, 1987, 101 Stat. 279; amended Pub. L. 102–484, div. A, title VIII, § 817(b), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2455; Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title XV, § 1502(a)(1), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 502; Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title X, § 1067(1), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 774; Pub. L. 111–23, title II, § 206(b), May 22, 2009, 123 Stat. 1728; Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title X, § 1071(f)(18), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3511; Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title VIII, § 825(a), Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 907; Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title VIII, §§ 807(b), 847(a), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2261, 2292; Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title VIII, § 831, title X, § 1081(a)(38), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1467, 1596; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, § 1846(c)(1), (d)(1), (f)(1), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4248–4250, defined major defense acquisition program. See sections 4201, 4202(a), and 4204 of this title. #### Effective Date of Repeal Repeal effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as a note preceding [section 3001 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section3001&num=0&edition=prelim).

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 2430

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 4571 — Repealed. Pub. L. 119–60, div. A, title VIII, § 811(a)(1), Dec. 18, 2025, 139 Stat. 948]

### Statutory Notes Section, added Pub. L. 111–383, div. A, title VIII, § 805(a)(1), Jan. 7, 2011, 124 Stat. 4259, § 2223a; renumbered § 4571 and amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, § 1857(b), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4276, related to information technology acquisition: planning and oversight processes. #### Electromagnetic Spectrum Demonstration Program Pub. L. 118–159, div. A, title II, § 234, Dec. 23, 2024, 138 Stat. 1839, which authorized a demonstration program to assess the viability of using wideband adaptive signal processing technology to support simultaneous transmit and receive signals on the same electromagnetic spectrum frequency band, was transferred and is set out as a note under [section 4001 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section4001&num=0&edition=prelim). #### Policies for Management and Certification of Link 16 Military Tactical Data Link Network Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title II, § 228, Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 199, as amended by Pub. L. 119–60, div. A, title II, § 216, Dec. 18, 2025, 139 Stat. 775, which directed the Secretary of Defense shall develop and implement policies to adapt Link 16 system management and certification to align with agile development practices, was transferred and is set out as a note under [section 4001 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section4001&num=0&edition=prelim). #### Requirements for Deployment of Fifth Generation Information and Communications Capabilities to Military Installations and Other Department Facilities Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title XV, § 1526, Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 557, which required the Secretary of Defense shall develop and implement a strategy for deploying to military installations a

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 4571

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 3602 — Middle tier of acquisition for rapid prototyping and rapid fielding

**(a) Guidance Required.—** The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, in consultation with the Comptroller of the Department of Defense and the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, shall establish pathways as described under subsection (b) to establish a process for conducting middle tier acquisitions for programs or projects that are intended to be completed in a period of two to five years. **(b) Acquisition Pathways.—** The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall establish the following two acquisition pathways: (1) **Rapid prototyping.—** — The rapid prototyping pathway shall provide for the use of innovative technologies to rapidly develop fieldable prototypes to demonstrate new capabilities and meet emerging military needs. The objective of an acquisition program or project under this pathway shall be to field a prototype that can be demonstrated in an operational environment and provide for a residual operational capability within five years of the development of an approved requirement. (2) **Rapid fielding.—** — The rapid fielding pathway shall provide for the use of proven technologies to field production quantities of new or upgraded systems with minimal development required. The objective of an acquisition program or project under this pathway shall be to begin production within six months and complete fielding within five years of the development of an approved requirement. **(c) Expedited Process.—** (1) **In general.—** — Before using the authority under this section, the Under Secretary shall develop a streamlined and coordinated requirements, budget, and acquisition process that results in the development of an approved requirement for each acquisition program or project in a period of not more

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 3602

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 2223a — Renumbered § 4571]

<a id="section-2224"></a>

Source: U.S. Code supplied Markdown snapshot · 10 U.S.C. § 2223a

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed; partially_verified. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 101 — Definitions

**(a) In General.—** The following definitions apply in this title: (1) The term “United States”, in a geographic sense, means the States and the District of Columbia. (2) Repealed. Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title X, § 1057(a)(1), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3440.] (3) The term “possessions” includes the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Guano Islands, so long as they remain possessions, but does not include any Commonwealth. (4) The term “armed forces” means the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Space Force, and Coast Guard. (5) The term “uniformed services” means— (A) the armed forces; (B) the commissioned corps of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; and (C) the commissioned corps of the Public Health Service. (6) The term “department”, when used with respect to a military department, means the executive part of the department and all field headquarters, forces, reserve components, installations, activities, and functions under the control or supervision of the Secretary of the department. When used with respect to the Department of Defense, such term means the executive part of the department, including the executive parts of the military departments, and all field headquarters, forces, reserve components, installations, activities, and functions under the control or supervision of the Secretary of Defense, including those of the military departments. (7) The term “executive part of the department” means the executive part of the Department of Defense, Department of the Army, Department of the Navy, or Department of the Air Force, as the case may be, at the seat of government. (8) The term “military departments” means the Department of the Army, the Department of the Navy, and the Department of the Air Force. (9) The term

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 101

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 139 — Director of Operational Test and Evaluation

**(a)** (1) There is a Director of Operational Test and Evaluation in the Department of Defense, appointed from civilian life by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The Director shall be appointed without regard to political affiliation and solely on the basis of fitness to perform the duties of the office of Director. The Director may be removed from office by the President. The President shall communicate the reasons for any such removal to both Houses of Congress. (2) In this section: (A) The term “operational test and evaluation” means— (i) the field test, under realistic combat conditions, of any item of (or key component of) weapons, equipment, or munitions for the purpose of determining the effectiveness and suitability of the weapons, equipment, or munitions for use in combat by typical military users; and (ii) the evaluation of the results of such test. (B) The term “major defense acquisition program” means a Department of Defense acquisition program that is a major defense acquisition program for purposes of [section 4201 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section4201&num=0&edition=prelim) or that is designated as such a program by the Director for purposes of this section. **(b)** The Director is the principal adviser to the Secretary of Defense, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, and the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering on operational test and evaluation in the Department of Defense and the principal operational test and evaluation official within the senior management of the Department of Defense. The Director shall— (1) ensure that all operational test and evaluation activities are aligned with, and are condu

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 139

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.