Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
6 U.S.C. § 572 — Acquisition baseline establishment and reports
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Baseline requirements**
(1) **In general** — Before the Administration implements any security-related technology acquisition, the appropriate acquisition official of the Department shall establish and document a set of formal baseline requirements.
(2) **Contents** — The baseline requirements under paragraph (1) shall—
(A) include the estimated costs (including lifecycle costs), schedule, and performance milestones for the planned duration of the acquisition;
(B) identify the acquisition risks and a plan for mitigating those risks; and
(C) assess the personnel necessary to manage the acquisition process, manage the ongoing program, and support training and other operations as necessary.
(3) **Feasibility** — In establishing the performance milestones under paragraph (2)(A), the appropriate acquisition official of the Department, to the extent possible and in consultation with the Under Secretary for Science and Technology, shall ensure that achieving those milestones is technologically feasible.
(4) **Test and evaluation plan** — The Administrator, in consultation with the Under Secretary for Science and Technology, shall develop a test and evaluation plan that describes—
(A) the activities that are expected to be required to assess acquired technologies against the performance milestones established under paragraph (2)(A);
(B) the necessary and cost-effective combination of laboratory testing, field testing, modeling, simulation, and supporting analysis to ensure that such technologies meet the Administration’s mission needs;
(C) an efficient planning schedule to ensure that test and evaluation activities are completed without undue delay; and
(D) if commercial aviation passengers are expected to interact with the security-related techno
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 6 U.S.C. § 572
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: fa5bbb85ddde3e0d87642863d3ee4372b2493d82c1f9f8bb9d116c8bdf6de853. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_02580dc0049e8a778a3e90fc
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-6/section-572-acquisition-baseline-establishment-and-reports--b13a0432a5.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 568d973a22cba29051bdf0007de789d8b6be0af0c60f79e22d31115cae9de888
Source location: Title 6, Chapter 1, § 572; chapter-001-homeland-security-organization.md
Stored source content
**(a) Baseline requirements**
(1) **In general** — Before the Administration implements any security-related technology acquisition, the appropriate acquisition official of the Department shall establish and document a set of formal baseline requirements.
(2) **Contents** — The baseline requirements under paragraph (1) shall—
(A) include the estimated costs (including lifecycle costs), schedule, and performance milestones for the planned duration of the acquisition;
(B) identify the acquisition risks and a plan for mitigating those risks; and
(C) assess the personnel necessary to manage the acquisition process, manage the ongoing program, and support training and other operations as necessary.
(3) **Feasibility** — In establishing the performance milestones under paragraph (2)(A), the appropriate acquisition official of the Department, to the extent possible and in consultation with the Under Secretary for Science and Technology, shall ensure that achieving those milestones is technologically feasible.
(4) **Test and evaluation plan** — The Administrator, in consultation with the Under Secretary for Science and Technology, shall develop a test and evaluation plan that describes—
(A) the activities that are expected to be required to assess acquired technologies against the performance milestones established under paragraph (2)(A);
(B) the necessary and cost-effective combination of laboratory testing, field testing, modeling, simulation, and supporting analysis to ensure that such technologies meet the Administration’s mission needs;
(C) an efficient planning schedule to ensure that test and evaluation activities are completed without undue delay; and
(D) if commercial aviation passengers are expected to interact with the security-related technology, methods that could be used to measure passenger acceptance of and familiarization with the security-related technology.
(5) **Verification and validation** — The appropriate acquisition official of the Department—
(A) subject to subparagraph (B), shall utilize independent reviewers to verify and validate the performance milestones and cost estimates developed under paragraph (2) for a security-related technology that pursuant to [section 563(d)(2) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title6-section563/d/2&num=0&edition=prelim) has been identified as a high priority need in the most recent Plan; and
(B) shall ensure that the use of independent reviewers does not unduly delay the schedule of any acquisition.
(6) **Streamlining access for interested vendors** — The Administrator shall establish a streamlined process for an interested vendor of a security-related technology to request and receive appropriate access to the baseline requirements and test and evaluation plans that are necessary for the vendor to participate in the acquisitions process for that technology.
**(b) Review of baseline requirements and deviation; report to Congress**
(1) **Review**
(A) *In general* — The appropriate acquisition official of the Department shall review and assess each implemented acquisition to determine if the acquisition is meeting the baseline requirements established under subsection (a).
(B) *Test and evaluation assessment* — The review shall include an assessment of whether—
(i) the planned testing and evaluation activities have been completed; and
(ii) the results of that testing and evaluation demonstrate that the performance milestones are technologically feasible.
(2) **Report** — Not later than 30 days after making a finding described in clause (i), (ii), or (iii) of subparagraph (A), the Administrator shall submit a report to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives that includes—
(A) the results of any assessment that finds that—
(i) the actual or planned costs exceed the baseline costs by more than 10 percent;
(ii) the actual or planned schedule for delivery has been delayed by more than 180 days; or
(iii) there is a failure to meet any performance milestone that directly impacts security effectiveness;
(B) the cause for such excessive costs, delay, or failure; and
(C) a plan for corrective action.
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) In general** There is established in the Department an Emergency Communications Division. The Division shall be located in the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency.
**(b) Executive Assistant Director** The head of the Division shall be the Executive Assistant Director for Emergency Communications (in this section referred to as the “Executive Assistant Director”). The Executive Assistant Director shall report to the Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. All decisions of the Executive Assistant Director that entail the exercise of significant authority shall be subject to the approval of the Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency.
**(c) Responsibilities** The Executive Assistant Director shall—
(1) assist the Secretary in developing and implementing the program described in [section 194(a)(1) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title6-section194/a/1&num=0&edition=prelim), except as provided in [section 195 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title6-section195&num=0&edition=prelim);
(2) administer the Department’s responsibilities and authorities relating to the SAFECOM Program, excluding elements related to research, development, testing, and evaluation and standards;
(3) administer the Department’s responsibilities and authorities relating to the Integrated Wireless Network program;
(4) conduct extensive, nationwide outreach to support and promote the ability of emergency response providers and relevant government officials to continue to communicate in the event of natural disasters, acts of terrorism, and other man-made disasters;
(5) conduct extensive, nationwide outreach and foster the development of interoper
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 6 U.S.C. § 578
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Coordination of grants and standards programs** The Secretary, acting through the Assistant Director for Emergency Communications, shall ensure that grant guidelines for the use of homeland security assistance administered by the Department relating to interoperable emergency communications are coordinated and consistent with the goals and recommendations in the National Emergency Communications Plan under [section 572 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title6-section572&num=0&edition=prelim).
**(b) Denial of eligibility for grants**
(1) **In general** — The Secretary, acting through the Assistant Secretary for Grants and Planning, and in consultation with the Assistant Director for Emergency Communications, may prohibit any State, local, or tribal government from using homeland security assistance administered by the Department to achieve, maintain, or enhance emergency communications capabilities, if—
(A) such government has not complied with the requirement to submit a Statewide Interoperable Communications Plan as required by [section 194(f) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title6-section194/f&num=0&edition=prelim);
(B) such government has proposed to upgrade or purchase new equipment or systems that do not meet or exceed any applicable national voluntary consensus standards and has not provided a reasonable explanation of why such equipment or systems will serve the needs of the applicant better than equipment or systems that meet or exceed such standards; and
(C) as of the date that is 3 years after the date of the completion of the initial National Emergency Communications Plan under [section 572 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 6 U.S.C. § 591
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) In general** There is established in each Regional Office a Regional Emergency Communications Coordination Working Group (in this section referred to as an “RECC Working Group”). Each RECC Working Group shall report to the relevant Regional Administrator and coordinate its activities with the relevant Regional Advisory Council.
**(b) Membership** Each RECC Working Group shall consist of the following:
(1) **Non-Federal** — Organizations representing the interests of the following:
(A) State officials.
(B) Local government officials, including sheriffs.
(C) State police departments.
(D) Local police departments.
(E) Local fire departments.
(F) Public safety answering points (9–1–1 services).
(G) State emergency managers, homeland security directors, or representatives of State Administrative Agencies.
(H) Local emergency managers or homeland security directors.
(I) Other emergency response providers as appropriate.
(2) **Federal** — Representatives from the Department, the Federal Communications Commission, and other Federal departments and agencies with responsibility for coordinating interoperable emergency communications with or providing emergency support services to State, local, and tribal governments.
**(c) Coordination** Each RECC Working Group shall coordinate its activities with the following:
(1) Communications equipment manufacturers and vendors (including broadband data service providers).
(2) Local exchange carriers.
(3) Local broadcast media.
(4) Wireless carriers.
(5) Satellite communications services.
(6) Cable operators.
(7) Hospitals.
(8) Public utility services.
(9) Emergency evacuation transit services.
(10) Ambulance services.
(11) HAM and amateur radio operators.
(12) Representatives from other priva
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 6 U.S.C. § 591g
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Establishment** There is established the Emergency Communications Preparedness Center (in this section referred to as the “Center”).
**(b) Operation** The Secretary, the Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Commerce, the Attorney General of the United States, and the heads of other Federal departments and agencies or their designees shall jointly operate the Center in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding entitled, “Emergency Communications Preparedness Center (ECPC) Charter”.
**(c) Functions** The Center shall—
(1) serve as the focal point for interagency efforts and as a clearinghouse with respect to all relevant intergovernmental information to support and promote (including specifically by working to avoid duplication, hindrances, and counteractive efforts among the participating Federal departments and agencies)—
(A) the ability of emergency response providers and relevant government officials to continue to communicate in the event of natural disasters, acts of terrorism, and other man-made disasters; and
(B) interoperable emergency communications;
(2) prepare and submit to Congress, on an annual basis, a strategic assessment regarding the coordination efforts of Federal departments and agencies to advance—
(A) the ability of emergency response providers and relevant government officials to continue to communicate in the event of natural disasters, acts of terrorism, and other man-made disasters; and
(B) interoperable emergency communications;
(3) consider, in preparing the strategic assessment under paragraph (2), the goals stated in the National Emergency Communications Plan under [section 572 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 6 U.S.C. § 591h
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Establishment** The Secretary shall establish the Interoperable Emergency Communications Grant Program to make grants to States to carry out initiatives to improve local, tribal, statewide, regional, national and, where appropriate, international interoperable emergency communications, including communications in collective response to natural disasters, acts of terrorism, and other man-made disasters.
**(b) Policy** The Assistant Director for Emergency Communications shall ensure that a grant awarded to a State under this section is consistent with the policies established pursuant to the responsibilities and authorities of the Emergency Communications Division under this subchapter, including ensuring that activities funded by the grant—
(1) comply with the statewide plan for that State required by [section 194(f) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title6-section194/f&num=0&edition=prelim); and
(2) comply with the National Emergency Communications Plan under [section 572 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title6-section572&num=0&edition=prelim), when completed.
**(c) Administration**
(1) **In general** — The Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency shall administer the Interoperable Emergency Communications Grant Program pursuant to the responsibilities and authorities of the Administrator under subchapter V.
(2) **Guidance** — In administering the grant program, the Administrator shall ensure that the use of grants is consistent with guidance established by the Assistant Director for Emergency Communications pursuant to [section 194(a)(1)(H) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title6-section194/a/1/H&num=0&edition=preli
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 6 U.S.C. § 593
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 284
TITLE 6—DOMESTIC SECURITY
§ 572
port on the resources and staff necessary to
carry out fully the responsibilities under this
subchapter.
(2) Comptroller General review
The Comptroller General shall review the
validity of the report submitted by the Sec-
retary under paragraph (1). Not later than 60
days after the date on which such report is
submitted, the Comptroller General shall sub-
mit to Congress a report containing the find-
ings of such review.
(g) Reference
Any reference to the Assistant Director for
Emergency Communications in any law, regula-
tion, map, document, record, or other paper of
the United States shall be deemed to be a ref-
erence to the Executive Assistant Director for
Emergency Communications.
(Pub. L. 107–296, title XVIII, § 1801, as added Pub.
L. 109–295, title VI, § 671(b), Oct. 4, 2006, 120 Stat.
1433; amended Pub. L. 115–278, § 2(g)(6)(A), Nov.
16, 2018, 132 Stat. 4179; Pub. L. 116–283, div. H,
title XC, § 9001(e)(1), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4767;
Pub. L. 117–263, div. G, title LXXI, § 7143(c)(3),
Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3662.)
Editorial Notes
CODIFICATION
Another section 1801 of Pub. L. 107–296 was renum-
bered section 1901 and is classified to section 591 of this
title.
AMENDMENTS
2022—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 117–263 substituted ‘‘Direc-
tor of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security
Agency’’ for ‘‘Director of Cybersecurity and Infrastruc-
ture Security’’ in two places.
2021—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 116–283, § 9001(e)(1)(A), in
heading, substituted ‘‘Executive Assistant Director’’
for ‘‘Assistant Director’’ and, in text, substituted ‘‘Ex-
ecutive Assistant Director for Emergency Communica-
tions (in this section referred to as the ‘Executive As-
sistant Director’).’’ for ‘‘Assistant Director for Emer-
g
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 6 U.S.C. § 572
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.