Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
5-1-115. Former prosecutions that are not affirmative defenses.
Arkansas Code — all titles (historical 2020) · legal_authorities
5-1-115. Former prosecutions that are not affirmative defenses.
A former prosecution is not an affirmative defense within the meaning of §§ 5-1-112 — 5-1-114 under any of the following circumstances:
(1) The former prosecution was before a court that lacked jurisdiction over the defendant or the offense;
(2) The former prosecution was procured by the defendant without the knowledge of the appropriate prosecuting official or aggrieved party and with the purpose of avoiding the sentence that might otherwise be imposed; or
(3) The former prosecution resulted in a judgment of conviction that was held invalid in a subsequent proceeding on a writ of habeas corpus, coram nobis, or similar process.
Source: Arkansas Code — historical release 78 (November 6, 2020) · 5-1-115
Stored review status: Historical 2020-11-06 source release; later amendments not reconciled; machine-extracted, not independently legally reviewed; source heading status: text_in_historical_source. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Issuing source page ↗
Authority boundary: historical statutory source snapshot not current law.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: arkansas_code:legal_authorities:5-1-115
Source file: gov.ar.code.title.05.odt
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 2f1ad6f38212ecb229333aa3ac583dc863a779fe60609e9334fc5a93a628d306
Source location: content.xml paragraph 956
Stored source content
5-1-115. Former prosecutions that are not affirmative defenses.
A former prosecution is not an affirmative defense within the meaning of §§ 5-1-112 — 5-1-114 under any of the following circumstances:
(1) The former prosecution was before a court that lacked jurisdiction over the defendant or the offense;
(2) The former prosecution was procured by the defendant without the knowledge of the appropriate prosecuting official or aggrieved party and with the purpose of avoiding the sentence that might otherwise be imposed; or
(3) The former prosecution resulted in a judgment of conviction that was held invalid in a subsequent proceeding on a writ of habeas corpus, coram nobis, or similar process.
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Arkansas Code — all titles (historical 2020) · legal_authorities
5-1-112. Affirmative defense — Former prosecution for same offense.
A former prosecution is an affirmative defense to a subsequent prosecution for the same offense under any of the following circumstances:
(1)(A) The former prosecution resulted in an acquittal.
(B)(i) There is an acquittal if the former prosecution resulted in a determination of not guilty.
(ii) A determination of guilt of a lesser included offense is an acquittal of the greater inclusive offense although the conviction is subsequently set aside;
(2)(A) The former prosecution resulted in a conviction.
(B) There is a conviction if the former prosecution resulted in a:
(i) Judgment of conviction that has not been reversed or vacated;
(ii) Verdict of guilty that has not been set aside and that is capable of supporting a judgment; or
(iii) Plea of guilty or nolo contendere accepted by the court; or
(3) The former prosecution was terminated without the express or implied consent of the defendant after the jury was sworn or, if trial was before the court, after the first witness was sworn, unless the termination was justified by overruling necessity.
Source: Arkansas Code — historical release 78 (November 6, 2020) · 5-1-112
Stored review status: Historical 2020-11-06 source release; later amendments not reconciled; machine-extracted, not independently legally reviewed; source heading status: text_in_historical_source. The source passage cites 5-1-112. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Arkansas Code — all titles (historical 2020) · legal_authorities
5-1-114. Affirmative defense — Former prosecution in another jurisdiction.
When conduct constitutes an offense within the concurrent jurisdiction of this state and of the United States or another state or territory of the United States, a prosecution in any such other jurisdiction is an affirmative defense to a subsequent prosecution in this state under the following circumstances:
(1) The first prosecution resulted in an acquittal or in a conviction as set out in § 5-1-112, and the subsequent prosecution is based on the same conduct unless:
(A) The offense of which the defendant was formerly convicted or acquitted and the offense for which he or she is subsequently prosecuted each requires proof of a fact not required by the other offense and the law defining each offense is intended to prevent a substantially different harm or evil; or
(B) The second offense was not consummated when the former trial began; or
(2) The former prosecution was terminated by an acquittal or by a final order or judgment for the defendant that has not been set aside, reversed, or vacated and that required a determination inconsistent with a fact that must be established for the conviction of the offense for which the defendant is subsequently prosecuted.
Source: Arkansas Code — historical release 78 (November 6, 2020) · 5-1-114
Stored review status: Historical 2020-11-06 source release; later amendments not reconciled; machine-extracted, not independently legally reviewed; source heading status: text_in_historical_source. The source passage cites 5-1-114. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.