Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
27-74-206. Removal — Directional sign exemption.
Arkansas Code — all titles (historical 2020) · legal_authorities
27-74-206. Removal — Directional sign exemption.
(a) The State Highway Commission, upon receipt of a declaration, resolution, certified copy of an ordinance, or other clear direction from a community, board of county commissioners, municipality, county, city, a specific region or area of the state, or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that removal of motorist services directional signs would cause an economic hardship in a defined area shall forward this declaration, resolution, or finding to the United States Secretary of Transportation for inclusion as a defined hardship area qualifying for exemption pursuant to 23 U.S.C. § 131(o).
(b) Any declaration or resolution submitted to the commission shall further find that the motorist services signs provide directional information about goods and services in the interest of the traveling public and shall request the retention in the specified areas by the state of directional motorist services signs as defined herein.
(c) The commission shall comply with all regulations issued both now and hereafter by the Federal Highway Administration necessary for application for the exemption provided in 23 U.S.C. § 131(o), provided that the motorist services directional signs were lawfully erected under state law at the time of their erection and were in existence on or prior to May 5, 1976.
Source: Arkansas Code — historical release 78 (November 6, 2020) · 27-74-206
Stored review status: Historical 2020-11-06 source release; later amendments not reconciled; machine-extracted, not independently legally reviewed; source heading status: text_in_historical_source. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Issuing source page ↗
Authority boundary: historical statutory source snapshot not current law.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: arkansas_code:legal_authorities:27-74-206
Source file: gov.ar.code.title.27.odt
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: a419fb9a184d4132c957dc06cc68d937d5f6897fc17f18f529cb3305ae80ea94
Source location: content.xml paragraph 25321
Stored source content
27-74-206. Removal — Directional sign exemption.
(a) The State Highway Commission, upon receipt of a declaration, resolution, certified copy of an ordinance, or other clear direction from a community, board of county commissioners, municipality, county, city, a specific region or area of the state, or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that removal of motorist services directional signs would cause an economic hardship in a defined area shall forward this declaration, resolution, or finding to the United States Secretary of Transportation for inclusion as a defined hardship area qualifying for exemption pursuant to 23 U.S.C. § 131(o).
(b) Any declaration or resolution submitted to the commission shall further find that the motorist services signs provide directional information about goods and services in the interest of the traveling public and shall request the retention in the specified areas by the state of directional motorist services signs as defined herein.
(c) The commission shall comply with all regulations issued both now and hereafter by the Federal Highway Administration necessary for application for the exemption provided in 23 U.S.C. § 131(o), provided that the motorist services directional signs were lawfully erected under state law at the time of their erection and were in existence on or prior to May 5, 1976.
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a)** The Congress hereby finds and declares that the erection and maintenance of outdoor advertising signs, displays, and devices in areas adjacent to the Interstate System and the primary system should be controlled in order to protect the public investment in such highways, to promote the safety and recreational value of public travel, and to preserve natural beauty.
**(b)** Federal-aid highway funds apportioned on or after January 1, 1968, to any State which the Secretary determines has not made provision for effective control of the erection and maintenance along the Interstate System and the primary system of outdoor advertising signs, displays, and devices which are within six hundred and sixty feet of the nearest edge of the right-of-way and visible from the main traveled way of the system, and Federal-aid highway funds apportioned on or after January 1, 1975, or after the expiration of the next regular session of the State legislature, whichever is later, to any State which the Secretary determines has not made provision for effective control of the erection and maintenance along the Interstate System and the primary system of those additional outdoor advertising signs, displays, and devices which are more than six hundred and sixty feet off the nearest edge of the right-of-way, located outside of urban areas, visible from the main traveled way of the system, and erected with the purpose of their message being read from such main traveled way, shall be reduced by amounts equal to 10 per centum of the amounts which would otherwise be apportioned to such State under [section 104 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title23-section104&num=0&edition=prelim), until such time as such State shall provide for such effective con
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 23 U.S.C. § 131
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 23 U.S.C. § 131. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 161
TITLE 23—HIGHWAYS
§ 131
fiscal year ending September 30, 1980, $100,000,000 for
the fiscal year ending September 30, 1981, and
$100,000,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30,
1982, and $50,000,000 for the fiscal year ending Sep-
tember 30, 1983, and $50,000,000 for the fiscal year ending
September 30, 1984, and $50,000,000 for the fiscal year
ending September 30, 1985, and $50,000,000 for the fiscal
year ending September 30, 1986, and $15,000,000 per fiscal
year for each of fiscal years 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991,
1992, 1993, and 1994, except that not more than two-
thirds of all funds authorized and expended under au-
thority of this section in any fiscal year shall be appro-
priated out of the Highway Trust fund. Notwith-
standing any other provision of this section, any
project which is not under construction, according to
the Secretary of Transportation, by September 30, 1985,
shall not be eligible for additional funds under this au-
thorization.
‘‘(q) The Secretary, in cooperation with State high-
way departments and local officials, shall conduct a
full and complete investigation and study of the prob-
lem of providing increased highway safety by the relo-
cation of railroad lines from the central area of cities
on a nationwide basis, and report to the Congress his
recommendations resulting from such investigation
and study not later than July 1, 1975, including an esti-
mate of the cost of such a program. Funds authorized
to carry out section 307 of title 23, United States Code,
are authorized to be used to carry out the investigation
and study required by this subsection.’’
DEMONSTRATION
PROJECT, RAILROAD-HIGHWAY
CROSS-
INGS; INCLUSION OF PROJECTS AT TERRE HAUTE, INDI-
ANA
Pub. L. 94–387, title I, § 101, Aug. 14, 1976, 90 Sta
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 23 U.S.C. § 131
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 23 U.S.C. § 131. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.