Arkansas Legal Resource Navigator

25-16-711. Disputes between Attorney General and a constitutional officer.

Arkansas Code — all titles (historical 2020) · legal_authorities

25-16-711. Disputes between Attorney General and a constitutional officer.

25-16-711. Disputes between Attorney General and a constitutional officer. In the event that the Attorney General and a constitutional officer disagree on the interpretation of any constitutional provision, act, rule, or regulation which affects the duties of that constitutional officer, the constitutional officer is authorized to employ special counsel to resolve the disagreement by litigation. This special counsel shall receive a reasonable compensation for his or her services.

Source: Arkansas Code — historical release 78 (November 6, 2020) · 25-16-711

Stored review status: Historical 2020-11-06 source release; later amendments not reconciled; machine-extracted, not independently legally reviewed; source heading status: text_in_historical_source. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Issuing source page ↗

Authority boundary: historical statutory source snapshot not current law.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: arkansas_code:legal_authorities:25-16-711
Source file: gov.ar.code.title.25.odt
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: b6f09da7daf7c04013cdbd5644167e9f12024fc391f6b11af9bad5bd69b4a213

Source location: content.xml paragraph 5816

Stored source content

25-16-711. Disputes between Attorney General and a constitutional officer. In the event that the Attorney General and a constitutional officer disagree on the interpretation of any constitutional provision, act, rule, or regulation which affects the duties of that constitutional officer, the constitutional officer is authorized to employ special counsel to resolve the disagreement by litigation. This special counsel shall receive a reasonable compensation for his or her services.

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

No explicit source connection was found. This does not mean there are no relevant authorities.