Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
23-55-802. Suspension and revocation of authorized delegates.
Arkansas Code — all titles (historical 2020) · legal_authorities
23-55-802. Suspension and revocation of authorized delegates.
(a) The commissioner may issue an order suspending or revoking the designation of an authorized delegate, if the commissioner finds that:
(1) the authorized delegate violated this chapter or a rule adopted or an order issued under this chapter;
(2) the authorized delegate did not cooperate with an examination or investigation by the commissioner;
(3) the authorized delegate engaged in fraud, intentional misrepresentation, or gross negligence;
(4) the authorized delegate is convicted of a violation of a state or federal anti-money laundering statute;
(5) the competence, experience, character, or general fitness of the authorized delegate or a person in control of the authorized delegate indicates that it is not in the public interest to permit the authorized delegate to provide money services; or
(6) the authorized delegate is engaging in an unsafe or unsound practice.
(b) In determining whether an authorized delegate is engaging in an unsafe or unsound practice, the commissioner may consider the size and condition of the authorized delegate's provision of money services, the magnitude of the loss, the gravity of the violation of this chapter or a rule adopted or order issued under this chapter, and the previous conduct of the authorized delegate.
(c) An authorized delegate may apply for relief from a suspension or revocation of designation as an authorized delegate according to procedures prescribed by the commissioner.
Source: Arkansas Code — historical release 78 (November 6, 2020) · 23-55-802
Stored review status: Historical 2020-11-06 source release; later amendments not reconciled; machine-extracted, not independently legally reviewed; source heading status: text_in_historical_source. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Issuing source page ↗
Authority boundary: historical statutory source snapshot not current law.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: arkansas_code:legal_authorities:23-55-802
Source file: gov.ar.code.title.23.odt
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: b047982cbed54842f9764f03f6e666b5ca8de5bab472febc70e0cf8ebb8be2e2
Source location: content.xml paragraph 27179
Stored source content
23-55-802. Suspension and revocation of authorized delegates.
(a) The commissioner may issue an order suspending or revoking the designation of an authorized delegate, if the commissioner finds that:
(1) the authorized delegate violated this chapter or a rule adopted or an order issued under this chapter;
(2) the authorized delegate did not cooperate with an examination or investigation by the commissioner;
(3) the authorized delegate engaged in fraud, intentional misrepresentation, or gross negligence;
(4) the authorized delegate is convicted of a violation of a state or federal anti-money laundering statute;
(5) the competence, experience, character, or general fitness of the authorized delegate or a person in control of the authorized delegate indicates that it is not in the public interest to permit the authorized delegate to provide money services; or
(6) the authorized delegate is engaging in an unsafe or unsound practice.
(b) In determining whether an authorized delegate is engaging in an unsafe or unsound practice, the commissioner may consider the size and condition of the authorized delegate's provision of money services, the magnitude of the loss, the gravity of the violation of this chapter or a rule adopted or order issued under this chapter, and the previous conduct of the authorized delegate.
(c) An authorized delegate may apply for relief from a suspension or revocation of designation as an authorized delegate according to procedures prescribed by the commissioner.
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
No explicit source connection was found. This does not mean there are no relevant authorities.