Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
23-46-407. Decision — Judicial review.
Arkansas Code — all titles (historical 2020) · legal_authorities
23-46-407. Decision — Judicial review.
(a) The State Banking Board shall render its decision in writing at or after a hearing before it, which decision shall include the board's findings of fact and conclusions of law.
(b)(1)(A) If the application is approved by the board, the Bank Commissioner may, in the event that he or she also shall approve the application, grant the relief sought.
(B) If the commissioner does not concur in the board's grant of the application, the relief sought shall not be granted, and the commissioner's written decision stating his or her reasons for not concurring shall be attached to the copy of the board's decision and shall be mailed to each person who actively appeared and participated in the hearing.
(2) If the board shall disapprove the application, the commissioner shall not grant the relief sought.
(c)(1) The time for filing a petition for judicial review under the Arkansas Administrative Procedure Act, § 25-15-201 et seq., shall run from the date the final decision of the board is mailed or delivered in written form to the parties desiring to appeal.
(2) The hearing of the petition for review will be advanced on the docket of each reviewing court as a matter of public interest.
Source: Arkansas Code — historical release 78 (November 6, 2020) · 23-46-407
Stored review status: Historical 2020-11-06 source release; later amendments not reconciled; machine-extracted, not independently legally reviewed; source heading status: text_in_historical_source. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Issuing source page ↗
Authority boundary: historical statutory source snapshot not current law.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: arkansas_code:legal_authorities:23-46-407
Source file: gov.ar.code.title.23.odt
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: f644218b6ae9a6121bc24d02e9aaa8059a13b59890bc29a7b8064e8b4466d606
Source location: content.xml paragraph 22188
Stored source content
23-46-407. Decision — Judicial review.
(a) The State Banking Board shall render its decision in writing at or after a hearing before it, which decision shall include the board's findings of fact and conclusions of law.
(b)(1)(A) If the application is approved by the board, the Bank Commissioner may, in the event that he or she also shall approve the application, grant the relief sought.
(B) If the commissioner does not concur in the board's grant of the application, the relief sought shall not be granted, and the commissioner's written decision stating his or her reasons for not concurring shall be attached to the copy of the board's decision and shall be mailed to each person who actively appeared and participated in the hearing.
(2) If the board shall disapprove the application, the commissioner shall not grant the relief sought.
(c)(1) The time for filing a petition for judicial review under the Arkansas Administrative Procedure Act, § 25-15-201 et seq., shall run from the date the final decision of the board is mailed or delivered in written form to the parties desiring to appeal.
(2) The hearing of the petition for review will be advanced on the docket of each reviewing court as a matter of public interest.
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Arkansas Code — all titles (historical 2020) · legal_authorities
25-15-201. Title.
This subchapter shall be known and cited as the “Arkansas Administrative Procedure Act”.
Source: Arkansas Code — historical release 78 (November 6, 2020) · 25-15-201
Stored review status: Historical 2020-11-06 source release; later amendments not reconciled; machine-extracted, not independently legally reviewed; source heading status: text_in_historical_source. The source passage cites 25-15-201. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.