Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
20-16-1403. Legislative findings.
Arkansas Code — all titles (historical 2020) · legal_authorities
20-16-1403. Legislative findings.
The General Assembly finds that:
(1) Pain receptors known as nociceptors are present throughout the unborn child's entire body by no later than sixteen (16) weeks after fertilization, and nerves link these receptors to the brain's thalamus and subcortical plate by no later than twenty (20) weeks;
(2)(A) By eight (8) weeks after fertilization, the unborn child reacts to touch.
(B) After twenty (20) weeks after fertilization, the unborn child reacts to stimuli that would be recognized as painful if applied to an adult human, for example, by recoiling;
(3) In the unborn child, application of such painful stimuli is associated with significant increases in stress hormones known as the stress response;
(4) Subjection to such painful stimuli is associated with long-term harmful neurodeveolopmental effects, such as altered pain sensitivity and, possibly, emotional, behavioral, and learning disabilities later in life;
(5) For the purposes of surgery on unborn children, fetal anesthesia is routinely administered and is associated with a decrease in stress hormones compared to those levels when painful stimuli are applied without such anesthesia;
(6)(A) The position, asserted by some medical experts, that the unborn child is incapable of experiencing pain until a point later in pregnancy than twenty (20) weeks after fertilization predominately rests on the assumption that the ability to experience pain depends on the cerebral cortex and requires nerve connections between the thalamus and the cortex.
(B) However, recent medical research and analysis, especially since 2007, provide strong evidence for the conclusion that a functioning cortex is not necessary to experience pain;
(7) Substantial evidence indicates that children bor
Source: Arkansas Code — historical release 78 (November 6, 2020) · 20-16-1403
Stored review status: Historical 2020-11-06 source release; later amendments not reconciled; machine-extracted, not independently legally reviewed; source heading status: text_in_historical_source. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Issuing source page ↗
Authority boundary: historical statutory source snapshot not current law.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: arkansas_code:legal_authorities:20-16-1403
Source file: gov.ar.code.title.20.odt
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: e6eb87975c102c8b790254e4a0d411e7ebfe89142b881d57c15b2fdb54bc69a7
Source location: content.xml paragraph 13725
Stored source content
20-16-1403. Legislative findings.
The General Assembly finds that:
(1) Pain receptors known as nociceptors are present throughout the unborn child's entire body by no later than sixteen (16) weeks after fertilization, and nerves link these receptors to the brain's thalamus and subcortical plate by no later than twenty (20) weeks;
(2)(A) By eight (8) weeks after fertilization, the unborn child reacts to touch.
(B) After twenty (20) weeks after fertilization, the unborn child reacts to stimuli that would be recognized as painful if applied to an adult human, for example, by recoiling;
(3) In the unborn child, application of such painful stimuli is associated with significant increases in stress hormones known as the stress response;
(4) Subjection to such painful stimuli is associated with long-term harmful neurodeveolopmental effects, such as altered pain sensitivity and, possibly, emotional, behavioral, and learning disabilities later in life;
(5) For the purposes of surgery on unborn children, fetal anesthesia is routinely administered and is associated with a decrease in stress hormones compared to those levels when painful stimuli are applied without such anesthesia;
(6)(A) The position, asserted by some medical experts, that the unborn child is incapable of experiencing pain until a point later in pregnancy than twenty (20) weeks after fertilization predominately rests on the assumption that the ability to experience pain depends on the cerebral cortex and requires nerve connections between the thalamus and the cortex.
(B) However, recent medical research and analysis, especially since 2007, provide strong evidence for the conclusion that a functioning cortex is not necessary to experience pain;
(7) Substantial evidence indicates that children born missing the bulk of the cerebral cortex, those with hydranencephaly, nevertheless experience pain;
(8) In adults, stimulation or ablation of the cerebral cortex does not alter pain perception, while stimulation or ablation of the thalamus does;
(9) Substantial evidence indicates that structures used for pain processing in early development differ from those of adults and use different neural elements available at specific times during development, such as the subcortical plate, to fulfill the role of pain processing;
(10) Consequently, there is substantial medical evidence that an unborn child is capable of experiencing pain by twenty (20) weeks after fertilization;
(11) It is the purpose of the state to assert a compelling state interest in protecting the lives of unborn children from the stage at which substantial medical evidence indicates that they are capable of feeling pain; and
(12) Mindful of Leavitt v. Jane L., 518 U.S. 137 (1996), in which in the context of determining the severability of a state statute regulating abortion, the United States Supreme Court noted that an explicit statement of legislative intent specifically made applicable to a particular statute is of greater weight than a general savings or severability clause, it is the intent of the state that § 1-2-117 be specifically applied to this subchapter, and moreover the General Assembly declares that it would have passed this subchapter, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or word in this subchapter, irrespective of the fact that any one (1) or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or words, or any of their applications, were to be declared unconstitutional.
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Arkansas Code — all titles (historical 2020) · legal_authorities
1-2-117. Severability of provisions of Code.
Except as otherwise specifically provided in this Code, in the event any title, subtitle, chapter, subchapter, section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, subparagraph, item, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Code is declared or adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such declaration or adjudication shall not affect the remaining portions of this Code which shall remain in full force and effect as if the portion so declared or adjudged invalid or unconstitutional was not originally a part of this Code.
Source: Arkansas Code — historical release 78 (November 6, 2020) · 1-2-117
Stored review status: Historical 2020-11-06 source release; later amendments not reconciled; machine-extracted, not independently legally reviewed; source heading status: text_in_historical_source. The source passage cites 1-2-117. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.