Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
2-23-107. Committee — Investigation and report — Findings as evidence.
Arkansas Code — all titles (historical 2020) · legal_authorities
2-23-107. Committee — Investigation and report — Findings as evidence.
(a) When the Director of the State Plant Board refers to the arbitration committee any complaint made by a buyer against a dealer or labeler, the committee shall make a full and complete investigation of the matters complained of and at the conclusion of the investigation, report through its secretary the findings and recommendations to the buyer and to the labeler by United States registered mail.
(b)(1) The report of arbitration shall be binding upon all parties to the extent, if any, that they have so agreed:
(A) In any contract governing the sale of the seed; or
(B) Before the official filing of arbitration.
(2) In the absence of an agreement to be bound by arbitration, a buyer may commence legal proceedings against a seller or assert such claim, as a counterclaim or defense in any action brought by the seller, at any time after the receipt of the report of arbitration.
(3)(A) In litigation involving a complaint which has been the subject of arbitration under this section, any party may introduce the report of arbitration as evidence of the facts found in the report, and the court may give such weight to the committee's findings and conclusions of law and recommendations as to damages and costs as the court may see fit based upon all the evidence before the court.
(B) The court may also take into account any findings of the committee with respect to the failure of any party to cooperate in the arbitration proceedings, including any finding as to the effect of delay in filing the arbitration claim upon the committee's ability to determine the facts of the case.
Source: Arkansas Code — historical release 78 (November 6, 2020) · 2-23-107
Stored review status: Historical 2020-11-06 source release; later amendments not reconciled; machine-extracted, not independently legally reviewed; source heading status: text_in_historical_source. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Issuing source page ↗
Authority boundary: historical statutory source snapshot not current law.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: arkansas_code:legal_authorities:2-23-107
Source file: gov.ar.code.title.02.odt
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 048d4b6724ef62549fcdaa28548fe5d7d157db89b043987b72330f4209362281
Source location: content.xml paragraph 6378
Stored source content
2-23-107. Committee — Investigation and report — Findings as evidence.
(a) When the Director of the State Plant Board refers to the arbitration committee any complaint made by a buyer against a dealer or labeler, the committee shall make a full and complete investigation of the matters complained of and at the conclusion of the investigation, report through its secretary the findings and recommendations to the buyer and to the labeler by United States registered mail.
(b)(1) The report of arbitration shall be binding upon all parties to the extent, if any, that they have so agreed:
(A) In any contract governing the sale of the seed; or
(B) Before the official filing of arbitration.
(2) In the absence of an agreement to be bound by arbitration, a buyer may commence legal proceedings against a seller or assert such claim, as a counterclaim or defense in any action brought by the seller, at any time after the receipt of the report of arbitration.
(3)(A) In litigation involving a complaint which has been the subject of arbitration under this section, any party may introduce the report of arbitration as evidence of the facts found in the report, and the court may give such weight to the committee's findings and conclusions of law and recommendations as to damages and costs as the court may see fit based upon all the evidence before the court.
(B) The court may also take into account any findings of the committee with respect to the failure of any party to cooperate in the arbitration proceedings, including any finding as to the effect of delay in filing the arbitration claim upon the committee's ability to determine the facts of the case.
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
No explicit source connection was found. This does not mean there are no relevant authorities.