Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
19-11-229. Competitive sealed bidding — Definition.
Arkansas Code — all titles (historical 2020) · legal_authorities
19-11-229. Competitive sealed bidding — Definition.
(a) Definition. “Competitive sealed bidding” means a method of procurement which requires:
(1) Issuance of an invitation for bids with a purchase description and all contractual terms and conditions applicable to the procurement;
(2) Public, contemporaneous opening of bids at a predesignated time and place;
(3) Unconditional acceptance of a bid without alteration or correction, except as authorized in §§ 19-11-204 and 19-11-228 — 19-11-240;
(4) Award to the responsive and responsible bidder who has submitted the lowest bid that meets the requirements and criteria set forth in the invitation for bids; and
(5) Public notice.
(b)(1) Contracts exceeding an estimated purchase price of seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000) shall be awarded by competitive sealed bidding unless a determination is made in writing by the agency procurement official or the State Procurement Director that this method is not practicable and advantageous and specifically states the reasons that this method is not practicable and advantageous.
(2) The director may provide by rule that it is not practicable to procure specified types of commodities, technical and general services, or professional and consultant services by competitive sealed bidding.
(3) Factors to be considered in determining whether competitive sealed bidding is not practicable shall include whether:
(A) Purchase descriptions are suitable for award on the basis of the lowest evaluated bid price; and
(B) The available sources, the time and place of performance, and other relevant circumstances are appropriate for the use of competitive sealed bidding.
(c) When it is considered impractical to initially prepare a purchase description to support an award base
Source: Arkansas Code — historical release 78 (November 6, 2020) · 19-11-229
Stored review status: Historical 2020-11-06 source release; later amendments not reconciled; machine-extracted, not independently legally reviewed; source heading status: text_in_historical_source. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Issuing source page ↗
Authority boundary: historical statutory source snapshot not current law.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: arkansas_code:legal_authorities:19-11-229
Source file: gov.ar.code.title.19.odt
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 6b212ac289188f379b774232038762f0ea3a893015cc9c97dbb12d8f0c4b5534
Source location: content.xml paragraph 15783
Stored source content
19-11-229. Competitive sealed bidding — Definition.
(a) Definition. “Competitive sealed bidding” means a method of procurement which requires:
(1) Issuance of an invitation for bids with a purchase description and all contractual terms and conditions applicable to the procurement;
(2) Public, contemporaneous opening of bids at a predesignated time and place;
(3) Unconditional acceptance of a bid without alteration or correction, except as authorized in §§ 19-11-204 and 19-11-228 — 19-11-240;
(4) Award to the responsive and responsible bidder who has submitted the lowest bid that meets the requirements and criteria set forth in the invitation for bids; and
(5) Public notice.
(b)(1) Contracts exceeding an estimated purchase price of seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000) shall be awarded by competitive sealed bidding unless a determination is made in writing by the agency procurement official or the State Procurement Director that this method is not practicable and advantageous and specifically states the reasons that this method is not practicable and advantageous.
(2) The director may provide by rule that it is not practicable to procure specified types of commodities, technical and general services, or professional and consultant services by competitive sealed bidding.
(3) Factors to be considered in determining whether competitive sealed bidding is not practicable shall include whether:
(A) Purchase descriptions are suitable for award on the basis of the lowest evaluated bid price; and
(B) The available sources, the time and place of performance, and other relevant circumstances are appropriate for the use of competitive sealed bidding.
(c) When it is considered impractical to initially prepare a purchase description to support an award based on price, an invitation for bids may be issued requesting the submission of unpriced technical proposals to be followed by an invitation for bids limited to those bidders whose technical proposals meet the requirements set forth in the first invitation.
(d) Notice inviting bids shall:
(1) Be given not fewer than five (5) calendar days nor more than ninety (90) calendar days preceding the date for the opening of bids by publishing the notice at least one (1) time in at least one (1) newspaper having general circulation in the state or posting by electronic media, but in all instances, adequate notice shall be given;
(2) Include a general description of the commodities, technical and general services, or professional and consultant services to be procured;
(3) State where invitations for bids may be obtained;
(4) State the date, time, and place of bid opening; and
(5) State the time, date, and place of the solicitation conference if a solicitation conference is to be held before the opening of bids to provide information to prospective bidders.
(e) Bids shall be opened publicly in the presence of one (1) or more witnesses at the time and place designated in the invitation for bids. Each bid, together with the name of the bidder, shall be recorded and open to public inspection.
(f)(1)(A) Bids shall be evaluated based on the requirements set forth in the invitation for bids.
(B) These requirements may include criteria to determine acceptability such as:
(i) Inspection;
(ii) Testing;
(iii) Quality;
(iv) Workmanship;
(v) Delivery;
(vi) Past performance; and
(vii) Suitability for a particular purpose and criteria affecting price such as life-cycle or total ownership costs.
(2)(A) The invitation for bids shall set forth the evaluation criteria to be used.
(B) No criteria may be used in bid evaluation that were not set forth in the invitation for bids.
(3)(A) A time discount may be considered in the evaluation of a bid only:
(i) If the state agency specifically solicits pricing that requests a time discount; and
(ii) Under the structured terms of the invitation for bids.
(B) If a bidder offers a time discount as part of its bid without the solicitation of time discounts by the state agency, the state agency shall not consider the time discount.
(g)(1) Correction of patent or provable errors in bids that do not prejudice other bidders or withdrawal of bids may be allowed only to the extent permitted under rules promulgated by the director and upon written approval of the Attorney General or a designee of such officer.
(2) No award shall be made on the basis of a corrected bid, if the corrected bid exceeds the next lowest bid of a responsible bidder.
(3)(A) The director or an agency procurement official may seek the clarification of a submitted bid.
(B) A written response by a bidder under this subsection shall only clarify the submitted bid and shall not add any substantive language to the submitted bid or change the terms of the submitted bid.
(C) If the bidder fails or refuses to clarify any matter questioned about the bidder's bid in writing by the deadline set by the director or agency procurement official, the bid may be rejected.
(D) If the bidder clarifies the matter questioned under this subsection in writing, the clarification shall be evaluated and become a part of any contract awarded on the basis of the bidder's bid.
(h)(1) The contract shall be awarded with reasonable promptness by written notice to the lowest responsible bidder whose bid meets the requirements and criteria set forth in the invitation for bids.
(2)(A) Except with respect to a contract being procured for a construction project, the director or the head of a procurement agency may negotiate a lower bid price, including changes in the bid requirements, with the lowest responsive and responsible bidder if:
(i) All bids received from responsive and responsible bidders exceed available funding as certified by the appropriate fiscal officer of the procurement agency; or
(ii) It appears that additional savings to the state may result from negotiation.
(B)(i)(a) If negotiations with the lowest responsive and responsible bidder conducted under subdivision (h)(2)(A) of this section fail to result in a lower bid price, the state may negotiate for a lower bid price with the next lowest responsive and responsible bidder.
(b) If negotiations with the next lowest responsive and responsible bidder under subdivision (h)(2)(B)(i)(a) of this section fail to result in a lower bid price, the state may negotiate for a lower bid price with the next lowest responsive and responsible bidder until an acceptable lower bid price is negotiated or the state determines that negotiations are no longer in the best interest of the state.
(ii) A bid price resulting from negotiations conducted under this section shall not be higher than:
(a) The bid price originally submitted by the lowest responsive and responsible bidder; or
(b) A price previously offered in negotiations by a responsive and responsible bidder.
(iii) Negotiations conducted under this section do not preclude the use of other methods of source selection or procurement authority provided under this subchapter.
(C)[Effective July 1, 2021.]
(i) Negotiations under this subsection shall be conducted by a person who is trained and certified in negotiation and procurement processes.
(ii)(a) The Office of State Procurement shall provide for the training and certification required under this subsection.
(b) The training provided by the office shall be specific to Arkansas law.
(3) All other bidders requesting to be notified of the award decision shall be promptly notified of the decision.
(i)(1) An invitation for bids may be cancelled or any or all bids may be rejected in writing by the director or the agency procurement official.
(2) Before the rejection of a bid by the director, the decision to reject the bid may be validated with the state agency for which the procurement is being conducted.
(3) A bid may be rejected for failure to adhere to mandatory requirements.
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Arkansas Code — all titles (historical 2020) · legal_authorities
19-11-204. Definitions concerning source selection and contract formation.
As used in this subchapter:
(1) “Competitive bidding” means the same as defined in § 19-11-234(a);
(2) “Competitive sealed bidding” means the same as defined in § 19-11-229(a);
(3) “Competitive sealed proposals” means the same as defined in § 19-11-230(a);
(4) “Emergency procurement” means the acquisition of commodities or services, which if not immediately initiated, will endanger human life or health, state property, or the functional capability of a state agency;
(5) “Established catalogue price” means the price included in a catalogue, price list, schedule, or other form that:
(A) Is regularly maintained by a manufacturer or contractor;
(B) Is either published or otherwise available for inspection by customers; and
(C) States prices at which sales are currently or were last made to a significant number of buyers constituting the general buying public for the commodities or services involved;
(6) “Invitation for bids” means all documents or electronic media, whether attached or incorporated by reference, utilized for soliciting bids in accordance with the procedures set forth in § 19-11-229, which refers to competitive sealed bidding;
(7) “Multiple award contracts” means a method of procurement whereby an indefinite quantity contract is awarded to more than one (1) supplier for furnishing a like item or category of items;
(8) “Purchase description” means specifications or any other document or electronic media describing the commodities or services to be procured;
(9) “Request for proposals” means all documents or electronic media, whether attached or incorporated by reference, utilized for soliciting proposals in accordance with the procedures set forth in § 19-11-230
Source: Arkansas Code — historical release 78 (November 6, 2020) · 19-11-204
Stored review status: Historical 2020-11-06 source release; later amendments not reconciled; machine-extracted, not independently legally reviewed; source heading status: text_in_historical_source. The source passage cites 19-11-204. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Arkansas Code — all titles (historical 2020) · legal_authorities
19-11-228. Methods of source selection.
Unless otherwise authorized by law, all contracts shall be awarded by competitive sealed bidding, pursuant to § 19-11-229, which refers to competitive sealed bidding, except as provided in:
(1) Section 19-11-230, which refers to competitive sealed proposals;
(2) Section 19-11-231, which refers to small procurements;
(3) Section 19-11-232, which refers to proprietary or sole source procurements;
(4) Section 19-11-233, which refers to emergency procurements;
(5) Section 19-11-234, which refers to competitive bidding;
(6) Section 19-11-262, which refers to multiple award contracts; or
(7) Section 19-11-263, which refers to special procurements.
Source: Arkansas Code — historical release 78 (November 6, 2020) · 19-11-228
Stored review status: Historical 2020-11-06 source release; later amendments not reconciled; machine-extracted, not independently legally reviewed; source heading status: text_in_historical_source. The source passage cites 19-11-228. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Arkansas Code — all titles (historical 2020) · legal_authorities
19-11-240. Reporting of suspected collusion — Definition.
(a) As used in this section, “collusion” means cooperation in the restraint of free and open competition in a public procurement, including without limitation:
(1) Price fixing;
(2) Bid rigging;
(3) Customer or market allocation;
(4) Misrepresenting the independence of the relationship between colluding parties; and
(5) Exerting improper influence on public officials to obtain advantage in a public procurement, including without limitation:
(A) Offering bribes or kickbacks;
(B) Extortion; and
(C) Fraudulent misrepresentation.
(b) When for any reason collusion is suspected among any bidders or offerors, a written notice of the relevant facts shall be transmitted to the Attorney General.
(c)(1) All documents involved in a procurement in which collusion is suspected shall be retained until the Attorney General gives notice that they may be destroyed.
(2) All retained documents shall be made available to the Attorney General or a designee upon request and proper receipt of the request.
(d) Collusion is cause for:
(1) Debarment from consideration for award of a contract under § 19-11-245; and
(2) Suspension from consideration for award of a contract if there is probable cause for suspecting collusion as determined by the Attorney General or the State Procurement Director.
Source: Arkansas Code — historical release 78 (November 6, 2020) · 19-11-240
Stored review status: Historical 2020-11-06 source release; later amendments not reconciled; machine-extracted, not independently legally reviewed; source heading status: text_in_historical_source. The source passage cites 19-11-240. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.