Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
16-108-210. Consolidation of separate arbitration proceedings.
Arkansas Code — all titles (historical 2020) · legal_authorities
16-108-210. Consolidation of separate arbitration proceedings.
(a) Except as otherwise provided in subsections (c) and (d), upon motion of a party to an agreement to arbitrate or to an arbitration proceeding, the court may order consolidation of separate arbitration proceedings as to all or some of the claims if:
(1) there are separate agreements to arbitrate or separate arbitration proceedings between the same persons, or one of them is a party to a separate agreement to arbitrate or a separate arbitration proceeding with a third person;
(2) the claims subject to the agreements to arbitrate arise in substantial part from the same transaction or series of related transactions;
(3) the existence of a common issue of law or fact creates the possibility of conflicting decisions in the separate arbitration proceedings; and
(4) prejudice resulting from a failure to consolidate is not outweighed by the risk of undue delay or prejudice to the rights of or hardship to parties opposing consolidation.
(b) The court may order consolidation of separate arbitration proceedings as to some claims and allow other claims to be resolved in separate arbitration proceedings.
(c) Except as provided in subsection (d) of this section, the court may not order consolidation of the claims of a party to an agreement to arbitrate if the agreement prohibits consolidation.
(d)(1) An agreement that prohibits the consolidation of arbitration claims or proceedings or denies arbitration for a class of persons involving substantially similar issues shall be closely scrutinized and shall not be enforced if found unconscionable.
(2) An agreement may be found unconscionable under this subsection (d) if:
(A) The agreement is unreasonable, one-sided, or contains language that is difficult
Source: Arkansas Code — historical release 78 (November 6, 2020) · 16-108-210
Stored review status: Historical 2020-11-06 source release; later amendments not reconciled; machine-extracted, not independently legally reviewed; source heading status: text_in_historical_source. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Issuing source page ↗
Authority boundary: historical statutory source snapshot not current law.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: arkansas_code:legal_authorities:16-108-210
Source file: gov.ar.code.title.16.odt
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 67777a1efee95256296724c4475ce6b46f60fd383d7ed3cfaf6568c7e7e487d3
Source location: content.xml paragraph 43068
Stored source content
16-108-210. Consolidation of separate arbitration proceedings.
(a) Except as otherwise provided in subsections (c) and (d), upon motion of a party to an agreement to arbitrate or to an arbitration proceeding, the court may order consolidation of separate arbitration proceedings as to all or some of the claims if:
(1) there are separate agreements to arbitrate or separate arbitration proceedings between the same persons, or one of them is a party to a separate agreement to arbitrate or a separate arbitration proceeding with a third person;
(2) the claims subject to the agreements to arbitrate arise in substantial part from the same transaction or series of related transactions;
(3) the existence of a common issue of law or fact creates the possibility of conflicting decisions in the separate arbitration proceedings; and
(4) prejudice resulting from a failure to consolidate is not outweighed by the risk of undue delay or prejudice to the rights of or hardship to parties opposing consolidation.
(b) The court may order consolidation of separate arbitration proceedings as to some claims and allow other claims to be resolved in separate arbitration proceedings.
(c) Except as provided in subsection (d) of this section, the court may not order consolidation of the claims of a party to an agreement to arbitrate if the agreement prohibits consolidation.
(d)(1) An agreement that prohibits the consolidation of arbitration claims or proceedings or denies arbitration for a class of persons involving substantially similar issues shall be closely scrutinized and shall not be enforced if found unconscionable.
(2) An agreement may be found unconscionable under this subsection (d) if:
(A) The agreement is unreasonable, one-sided, or contains language that is difficult to notice or to understand;
(B) A meaningful choice of whether or not to agree to the arbitration provisions of the agreement is not provided; or
(C) The agreement is not balanced or fair under reasonable standards of fair dealing.
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
No explicit source connection was found. This does not mean there are no relevant authorities.