Connected, source-aware legal navigation
Turn “I don’t know what’s happening” into a map.
Describe the situation in ordinary language. The system separates possible issues, asks what is missing, maps procedural branches, organizes evidence, compares dates with stored rules, explains who may have authority, and links back to Arkansas sources.
Tell the system what happened, not what the legal term is.
Resident language is mapped to structured issue candidates, subissues, follow-up questions, and possible pathways.
Possible issues are labeled as inferred. They become user-confirmed only when you confirm them, and never become verified facts merely because the wording matched.
Explore possible process branches without pretending to predict the case.
Select a pathway or carry one forward from the situation analysis. Answering questions can narrow the map.
Questions that can change the branch
Accessible text version of the map
Compare a recorded timeline with structured procedural expectations.
The auditor can identify a found event, missing information, an apparent timing concern, or a possible exception. It does not declare a legal violation.
Ask “What am I missing?” without calling every suggestion mandatory.
The result separates required, commonly relevant, potentially useful, optional, unknown, and not-applicable items.
Connect evidence to events, claims, and issues without deciding credibility.
Everything in this workspace is saved locally in the browser. Export before clearing browser data.
Add evidence
Add claim or allegation
Claim and evidence matrix
Linking material to a claim is organizational, not a finding that the material is authentic or persuasive.
| Issue / claim | Status | Supporting | Contradictory | Unlinked evidence |
|---|
Understand what a legal or government document appears to do.
Extract document type, issuer, dates, action language, important sections, terms, possible process stage, privacy risks, and related resources.
Paste redacted text whenever possible. Document uploads are ephemeral and should not include information you do not need analyzed.
Preserve the path, not merely the last URL.
Search source passages, save page/section/paragraph locations, record notes, and export a reproducible research trail.
Saved research trail
Separate official dates, user-entered dates, and planning estimates.
Calendar entries preserve the source, trigger, calculation method, and date status.
Readiness checklist
| Date | Title | Status | Source / trigger | Action |
|---|
Show uncertainty, history, and database gaps instead of quietly smoothing them over.
Inspect source conflicts, legal-rule versions, knowledge gaps, and topic coverage. These dashboards measure the Navigator, not Arkansas institutions.
Possible source conflicts
Rule history
Knowledge gaps
Coverage heatmap
The system can organize uncertainty. It cannot erase it.
Use official documents, court and agency instructions, source dates, and human legal assistance for decisions that affect rights, deadlines, custody, liberty, housing, benefits, or safety.